I was thinking that the second magnetic field of the sun came into play. There is no information as to whether or not this 'crush structure' is originated from deep in the sun or shallow.

Cue the EU zealots in 3...2...1...

Ewwwww, think of the warming that will create within the entire solar system.

Oooppps I forgot, except for on planet Earth where the only warming effects are manmade, mostly caused by by the excessive expletives of Al Gore's congregants within the Church of the Holy Hockey Stick.

"Magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience" Hannes Alfven

As is much of the description above. The magnetic topology is a result of the electric currents which creates the magnetic fields. And yet, not a single reference to said currents.

@nazi sympathizing eu pseudoscience cult idiot

"Magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience" Hannes Alfven

outdated quote that is falsified by experimental evidence, like: The PPPL Magnetic Reconnection Experiment (MRX) which was built to study a fundamental plasma process in a controlled laboratory environment

Researchers have run this and similar experiments — called "shots" — more than 100,000 times since 1995 and amassed volumes of data and numerous scientific papers

http://www.pppl.g...HEET.pdf

this is also validated by every other plasma physics lab in the world
therefore it is scientific fact, and you, hannes and the eu cult are wrong

And yet, not a single reference to said currents

so it doesn't mention your chosen holy word (and you don't understand it)
it also didn't mention jesus or zeus
so what?

facts are facts, regardless of your belief in them

another epic eu fail

@cantdrive85.

The magnetic topology is a result of the electric currents which creates the magnetic fields. And yet, not a single reference to said currents.

Actually they 'hid' references to same in terminology such as:

"filaments"

and

"downflows of cool plasma"

and

"Magnetic Flux Rope (MFR)-like structure"

...all of 'features' which involve currents of plasma/ions/electrons which twist themselves much as the plasma/electron currents similarly observable as in-spiraling, self-reinforcing and self-compressing 'flows' which converge and twist into explosive/unstable PLASMOIDS involving the twisted magnetic fields components which the currents created in the first instance.

So, cantdrive, your comment is not totally correct; although it *is easy* to miss the allusions to plasma/electron/ion 'currents' in such 'papers' where said allusions are well 'hidden' (intentionally or innocently) by jargon effectively relegating "currents" to mere 'incidentals'.

"Magnetic reconnection is pseudoscience" Hannes Alfven

As is much of the description above. The magnetic topology is a result of the electric currents which creates the magnetic fields. And yet, not a single reference to said currents.

Hmmm. and then we have Alfven's old colleague, friend and co-author, saying this, 12 years after the death of Alfven:

In fact, the most interesting plasma physics occurs precisely where and because this equation is not satisfied, such as the auroral acceleration region, ***magnetic field reconnection***, turbulence, shocks, and many wave modes.

My emphasis.

On the Concept of Moving Magnetic Field Lines (2007)
Falthammar, C-G & Mozer, F. S.
http://onlinelibr...0002/pdf

The magnetic topology is a result of the electric currents which creates the magnetic fields. And yet, not a single reference to said currents.

Why would there be? As RC pointed out, this is a paper on what is happening to the flare due to MAGNETIC FIELDS. It is not Solar Science 101 for the hard of thinking. It is aimed at PEERS. It is assumed in such papers that the knowledge of where the fields come from is already known. It is not a paper for the general public, or the idiots at thunderdolts, where every single process within the Sun, that leads to the magnetic fields, needs to be explained. It'd be like discussing tidal ranges in the Earths seas, without pointing out that tides are caused by the Moon. Assumed knowledge, no need to repeat it.

In fact, the most interesting plasma physics occurs precisely where and because this equation is not satisfied, such as the auroral acceleration region, ***magnetic field reconnection***, turbulence, shocks, and many wave modes.

My emphasis.

On the Concept of Moving Magnetic Field Lines (2007)
Falthammar, C-G & Mozer, F. S.
http://onlinelibr...0002/pdf

Nice cherry pick, did yoy happen to read the whole paper where he agrees with Alfven's claims? Fron linked paper;
"W. Belcher discussed the concept of magnetic field line motion as a useful tool in teaching electromagnetic theory in an article in Eos [Belcher, 2005]. However, there are some important limitations and pitfalls to this concept, none of which is mentioned in the article by Belcher..."
con't

"....The purpose of these comments is to urge caution in using the moving magnetic field line construct becaus e two kinds of problems have arisen from its misuse. The first kind of problem is that the construct of moving field lines is sometimes used to produce the incorrect magnetic field evolution in cases where equation (2) is not satisfied."
He goes on;
"The second concern is that the construct of moving field lines is sometimes confused with the concept of moving flux tubes....This conclusion is wrong for two reasons. First, it is meaningless to assert that a field line that was at A is now at B, becaus e there is no way to identify or distinguish one magnetic field line from another. Second, the concept of moving magnetic field lines is reasonable if it is used only for visualizing
the temporal evolution of the magnetic field, and then, only if equation (2) is satisfied..."
So it would seem as if Falthammar is in full agreement with Alfven, contrary to your lies...

@nazi sympathizing idiot eu pseudoscience cult peon

So it would seem as if Falthammar is in full agreement with Alfven

1- it would seem like this only to someone attempting to ignore the elephant in the room because there is a hair on his chair

2- what about the very specific part where he acknowledges ***magnetic field reconnection*** (emphasis Jonesdave, but relevant)?

more importantly, if he directly supports your cult, why then is he making claims of support for what you consider pseudoscience?

by definition, that is heresy in a religion especially when you specifically state it as being pseudoscience or wrong
(the eu is religion, considering they can't actually provide any evidence that is reputable, let alone factual, predictive, etc)

the conclusion is that you are specifically cherrypicking data from the study while ignoring the overall (or any) conclusions in order to validate your beliefs

that is religion in a NUTshell, emphasis intentional

This comment has been removed by a moderator.