Now isn't that the weirdest thing. Hurricanes in Arabia. Looks like another notch in the gun of truth that AGW is altering the climate. If it isn't over there, it's over here. Massive wild fires in CA, Huston floods, Puerto Rico devastated, etc etc and all linked to usage of fossil fuels and the ever *increasing* CO2 levels which is now at 405.14ppm. https://www.co2.earth

more propaganda ,,, see lots of storms here ,,,https://en.wikipe...Pre-1900

and of course we r just making this up as we go

''(Real observations of extreme cyclone activity in the Arabian Sea are limited because there was no full weather-satellite coverage in this area before 1998.) ''

Several days before these storms began there was prolonged solar activity with an "Earth directed component".
http://www.spacew...ear=2017
Their prediction was likely merely a coincidence.

The people who are most skeptical about climate change are climate scientists.

That is the biggest pile of horseshit I've read in awhile. It's their religion in which they are the priests passing around their collection plates. And they don't wait until Sunday, they do it daily.

Take a look at hard evidence , yes go look at monthly avg charts at weather sites ( if u can find them ) u won't see any hockey sticks.

Arguing against evidence again.

#climatetrolls and #physicstrolls always argue against evidence. It's their signature.

I can see making ridiculous and counter factual comments and assertions about climate change in the Post, or the NYT, where the average forum participant isn't too bright.

But coming to a science forum where most of the visitors are going to know your post indicates only ignorance seems sort of like broadcasting one's stupidity in a place where it is maximally visible.

Interesting ? What things look like isn't evidence . Monthly avg charts look flat .

ww.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/06/tidalgate-climate-alarmists-caught-faking-sea-level-rise/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

@snoosebaum says;

Take a look at hard evidence , yes go look at monthly avg charts at weather sites ( if u can find them ) u won't see any hockey sticks.

Just follow the link to your enlightenment.

https://www.skept...tick.htm

''Since the hockey stick paper in 1998, there have been a number of proxy studies analysing a variety of different sources including corals, stalagmites, tree rings, boreholes and ice cores. They all confirm the original hockey stick conclusion: the 20th century is the warmest in the last 1000 years and that warming was most dramatic after 1920.''

thanks for making my point , anything cept the actual temp record ordinaire

''Since the hockey stick paper in 1998, there have been a number of proxy studies analysing a variety of different sources including corals, stalagmites, tree rings, boreholes and ice cores. They all confirm the original hockey stick conclusion: the 20th century is the warmest in the last 1000 years and that warming was most dramatic after 1920.''

thanks for making my point , anything cept the actual temp record ordinaire

What? Didn't you scroll down past the first paragraph? There you would have found chart after chart showing actual temp records with a very prominent hockeystick (exponential) uptick in global average temperatures. It doesn't take much to see that.

What it does take is a lot of turds packed between your ears to not see that and then regurgitate false rightwing propaganda and beg for your wingnut buddies to slap you on the ass. Yeah. So what your point again? That you can't read a chart or that you don't want to.