Please be aware that quantum mechanics is wrong because it does not take the effects of aether as the medium of light existing everywhere in the visible part of the universe, participating in all physical processes and delivering electromagnetic forces into account. The existence of aether is the direct conclusion of the disproof of Einstein's relativity (see https://www.resea...lativity and https://www.resea...niversal ).

Therefore, the wave property in the particle-wave duality is more likely the result of the wave of aether rather than the wave of probability which is not a physical substance and can't vibrate to become waves, but the wave of aether generated by the motion of the particle always accompanies the motion of each particle.

Unfortunately, @xin, this isn't theory. It's an experiment. Data trumps theory, always, and this is data. Experiments showed aether is bullshit in the 19th century; it's called the Michelson-Morley experiment. Do try to keep up.

The article would be considerably more informative if the basis or bases of the entanglement were discussed. Instead we got a hand-wave at "it's really complicated."

Do better, physorg.

On edit: luckily, the paper is not paywalled. Just follow the link at the end of the article above.

Unfortunately, @xin, this isn't theory. It's an experiment. Data trumps theory, always, and this is data. Experiments showed aether is bullshit in the 19th century; it's called the Michelson-Morley experiment. Do try to keep up.

Don't behave so naive and ignorant please!

Don't behave so naive and ignorant please!

I'm not the one ignoring an experiment from the nineteenth century; you are.

Don't behave so naive and ignorant please!

I'm not the one ignoring an experiment from the nineteenth century; you are.

It is you who is ignorant about what I have studied such as the well-known M-M experiment.

It is you who is ignorant about what I have studied such as the well-known M-M experiment.

Then describe it.

I can't believe you people are talking about aether.... SMH.... This site has gone DOWN HILL the last few years...

Aether dynamics is governed by something like non-linear partial-differential Navier-Stokes equations, not by Maxwell's equations which have involved many wrong concepts such as electric field. The so-called electric field is just to model the force exerting on a particle, but that force is not a field because it's the force exerted by a fluid aether, just like the force exerting on an airplane, which is never a field. The real waves are the solutions of the non-linear partial-differential equations, and can't be simplified as simple transverse waves.

So you're sure the Michelson-Morley experiment is wrong, but you can't explain how an interferometer works.

If you can't explain how something works, you don't understand it. If you don't understand something, you can't possibly have any valid reason for declaring it to be incorrect.

I knew I had you on ignore for some reason. Now I remember what it is.

Da Schneib, How can you make such conclusions?

Please be aware that M-M experiment only denies a rigid aether, but what I have found is a fluid aether.

@xnhangshen,
for the first time I see someone who correctly understood who is the main cause of all the phenomena which science seeks to explain on the basis of the nebulosity that Einstein and Lorenzo introduced into science, and so contaminated it, to go backwards to grasp the true causes of the phenomenon.
Here's to all of you and to all the scientists of the world who deal with this issue:
If something comes from something, they must have some of their backward features. We are also an example of human beings and all living beings. The offspring with their parents have backward mutual mutual relations and characteristics in interaction.
The whole universe is filled with the substance AETHER, from which matter is formed and a certain kind of matter has a backward relationship with Aether, which we can call a "family bond".

That's how gravity and magnetism emerge, which I am constantly repeating, but, unfortunately, science is immersed in the incorrect and false experiment of Morley.
Aether is neither matter nor energy, nor is it thick, nor is it rare, nor is it inhomogeneous, but it is something that can be understood only if the structure of the universe and the way of forming matter are known, and from it with the Aether there arise the emergence of gravity and magnetism. This intertwining of particles and their actions at a distance of the same can be explained only by the familiar way of how and from what magnetism forms. As science does not understand this phenomenon, it seeks to enforce its "laws" and the rules by which it should be accepted and solved the problem in the way they have envisioned in their Fatamorgana.

Aether like darkmatter does not exist

xinhangshen - Aether dynamics is governed by something like non-linear partial-differential Navier-Stokes equations, not by Maxwell's equations which have involved many wrong concepts such as electric field. The so-called electric field is just to model the force exerting on a particle, but that force is not a field because it's the force exerted by a fluid aether, just like the force exerting on an airplane, which is never a field. The real waves are the solutions of the non-linear partial-differential equations, and can't be simplified as simple transverse waves.

As your a fluid drains engineer xinhangshen, you use Navier-Stokes equations in your building work, their not applicable to aether dynamics because Aether like darkmatter does not exist.

@alexander2468,
Every reasonable and humane being, having the consciousness given to him, in his existence, must and must understand that there must be some substance from which matter is formed. How can matter be formed from matter (dark). What are the characteristics of this dark matter? Why are you so afraid of Aether when you are made of it? Who gave you all these qualities and opportunities to thwart everything around you and the causes of those formations? Even in our human beings, it would sometimes be the Big Bang we originated from. Are you a supporter of all the far-fetched and illogical theories that you are now using futilely and always hitting "head to the wall" when you want to prove something with these contradictory theories. If you do not understand yourself, how you were created, how can you think and make conclusions about what you have formed.
First, get rid of it and you will be clear about Aether and SEU.

@mackita,
Let's try to explain how magnetism appears in the universe at all, but to use our Aether substance model. Here I give you the advantage, to explain whether Aether influences the formation and appearance of magnetism. I will give my explanation, but if I need to explain in detail, I expect the Nobel Prize.

In your explanation, there is no evidence what magnetism is and how it arises. If this is not known, it is useless to make "cocktails" of various "findings," "claims," "proofs" that are only personal "imaging" of the phenomenon of controversy.
You mention various waves, some dense ether, movements, effects, and who knows what else, but can there be waves of any kind, and who does not have magnetism? This is not about waves of matter (water, or various fluids and gases), we are talking about electromagnetic wave currents. You must know: that there is a substance from which matter is formed, and later from the interrelationships between matter and that substance, gravity and magnetism develop, from which all the phenomena in the universe develop. You are burdened with the concept of vacuum, where you think there is nothing there, but if it is, that substance is the substance that forms the substance.
You have not given any clear proof of what magnetism is and how it occurs.

Mackita. Let me help you, and the whole science: the interaction between Aether and free gluons causes the appearance of magnetism. I said enough though this is my copyright.

All these discusions about the complexity of photons, distance and the rest are just the incentives to know the causes of the ghosts, but none of this can be logical if science does not know how photons are formed, and this applies to all other parts and particles of matter.